DUI & DWIClients’ ChoiceAward 2012-2019

Alcohol Detection Devices

DUI Breath Tester. Blow and Go. Car Breath Machine. No matter what you call it, or what you've heard it called, in the world of DUI legislation, it is called an Ignition Interlock Device (IID). As of 2009, the IID is a mandatory requirement for an Ignition Interlock License (IIL), requiring the driver to exhale into the machine before the ignition can be started, provided the breath-alcohol concentration is lower than the pre-programmed amount.

Drivers Convicted Of Alcohol Offenses (RCW 46.20.720)

As of 2012, the court is no longer required to order a person convicted of DUI / Physical Control or someone entering Deferred Prosecution to apply for an ignition interlock driver's license. That requirement is now in the hands of the Department of Licensing (DoL). They, along with the Washington State Patrol (WSP), monitor and enforce those who are required by law to have a functioning ignition interlock device installed on all motor vehicles operated by the person.

In most instances, when a person is convicted of DUI there is a period of suspension. While you can apply for an IIL during this period of suspension, and if approved, drive legally, once the period of suspension is completed, the requirement to apply for an IID (if you are not awarded full credit due to a longer criminal suspension / revocation than imposed by the DOL) begins anew. Consequently, depending on the length of the suspension or revocation, credit for suspension with IIL may be awarded, OR a new period of use of the IID and IIL begins.

This is because, following a DUI / Physical Control conviction the DoL SHALL require that, after any applicable period of suspension, revocation, or denial of driving privileges, a person may drive only a motor vehicle equipped with a functioning ignition interlock device if the person is convicted of an alcohol-related violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504 or an equivalent local ordinance.

When an IID is Mandatory

The IID / IIL is mandatory when there is a DUI / Physical Control conviction. It is not mandatory when the conviction is of a lesser or different type of alcohol-related conviction such as Reckless or Negligent Driving, unless there is a prior DUI conviction, where it thereby becomes mandatory. However, in the event there are no priors, the Court retains the authority to impose the IID or any other restrictions it deems proper. The device is also mandatory as a condition of your release upon being charged with a second DUI in a lifetime!

Required Duration of an IID

The period of time the device is required depends on whether you have been convicted of DUI / Physical Control previously, and whether you were previously ordered to have an IID.

If you have not previously been ordered by a court to be so restricted under this section One (1) year
If you have previous been restricted due to a prior DUI / Physical Control conviction Five (5) years
And if you have been previously ordered on 2 prior occasions to have an IID Ten (10) years

Exceptions to the Mandatory IID

In some instances, the DoL may waive the requirement for the use of such a device if such devices are not reasonably available in the local area. Furthermore, there is an exception for the device in employer-owned vehicles you drive and their vehicle is driven as a requirement of employment during working hours. In order to qualify for this exception, you must provide the DoL with a sworn declaration from your employer stating that your employer requires you to operate the employer-owned vehicle during working hours.

Early Release? No!

Regardless of the reason necessary for the IID, if it’s a Pre-trial order, or even of the DoL requires it Post-Conviction, the requirement to have an ignition interlock device has NO EARLY release provision.  If you remove the IID during a period of time when a Washington Court has ordered it as a result of a DUI condition of release, or whether you remove it after a conviction, your Washington Drivers License, or your privilege to drive in Washington with an out of state license will be suspended/revoked until the device re-installed.

A person can choose not to install it per the Court order, but then they shall not be able to drive legally, or after a conviction a person can remove early, or choose to not install, and the time needed to have the IID will pass, but not the last 6 months (effective July 2017 this period of time went from 4 months to 6 months).  This means that the last 6 months of IID requirement may not be eliminated.  Removal or non-installation of the IID leading up to the last 6 months is fine, but a person will not have a valid license.

At the conclusion of the time period, the DoL will not release the restriction until it receives proof that in the last 6 month of the IID time period you have not done any of the following in the previous 6 months:

  • Tried to start the vehicle with a blood-alcohol content of .04 or more;
  • Failed to take or pass any required retest;
  • Failed to get scheduled maintenance, repairs, calibration, monitoring, inspection, or replacement of the device;
  • If DoL has suspended/revoked your license.

If the device is removed early, or never installed then your drivers license is suspended, so why one is always free to remove it, or not install it, the fact remains the license is not valid and you must always show that the IID was installed, working, and had no violations in the final 6 months prior to the removal of the IID.

In Summary

As stated above, the installation of an IID is both discretionary and, at times, mandatory in any charge and alcohol-related conviction that is not a DUI / Physical Control. This is an example of the many pitfalls and collateral consequences of a DUI / Physical Control charge. Since these types of issues are constantly changing every time the legislative session ends, you need legal counsel that is aware, not only of the current law, but the future changes to that law that may take effect when your case concludes. Jonathan Rands is active in legislative changes, and since his practice is focused on DUI and all other alcohol-related crimes, he will protect your current and future legal interest.

New Ignition Interlock Requirements Effective September 2011

The department shall require that, after any period of suspension, revocation, or denial of driving privileges, a person may drive only a motor vehicle equipped with a functioning ignition interlock device if the person is convicted of a violation of RCW 46.61.502 (DUI) or 46.61.504 (Physical Control) or an equivalent local or out-of-state statute or ordinance (this would be a DUI from out of state). Furthermore, DoL shall require that a person may drive only a motor vehicle equipped with a functioning ignition interlock device if the person is convicted of a Negligent Driving or Reckless Driving and your conviction is the result of a charge that was originally filed as a DUI or Physical Control and you one or more prior offenses within seven years.

Under these circumstances, you shall be required to install an ignition interlock device on all vehicles you operate. This requirement may be waived if the DoL concludes that such devices are not reasonably available in the local area. As is the case with other IIDs, the installation of an ignition interlock device is NOT necessary on vehicles owned, leased, or rented by a person's employer and on those vehicles whose care and/or maintenance is the temporary responsibility of the employer, and driven at the direction of a person's employer as a requirement of employment during working hours. However, you must provide the department with a declaration under the penalty of perjury from your employer stating that your employment requires you to operate a vehicle owned by the employer or other persons during working hours. The DoL has a form for this, and it can also be done by order of the court upon sentencing.

The statute also requires that the IID shall be calibrated to prevent the motor vehicle from being started when the breath sample provided has an alcohol concentration of 0.025 or more. Depending on your criminal record for DUI convictions, or prior orders by a court to install an IID, the period of time of the restriction will be as set forth previously above.

Part of this new statutory restriction is that the IID SHALL remain in effect until the department receives a declaration from the person's ignition interlock device vendor, in a form provided or approved by the department, certifying that there have been none of the following incidents in the four consecutive months prior to the date of release:

  1. (a) An attempt to start the vehicle with a breath alcohol concentration of 0.04 or more;
  2. (b) Failure to take or pass any required retest; or
  3. (c) Failure of the person to appear at the ignition interlock device vendor when required for maintenance, repair, calibration, monitoring, inspection, or replacement of the device.

In the event one or all of the above occur, the requirement of the IID extends until there have been four months post violation. So a violation of (a) on month 10 of a 12 month IID, requires the IID to remain for 14 month, assuming no new violations.

Furthermore, under circumstances where IID is required, the DoL shall attach or imprint a notation on the driving record of any person restricted stating that the person may operate only a motor vehicle equipped with a functioning ignition interlock device. A license will not be issued to you if you are so restricted until or unless the DoL receives written verification by a company doing business in the state that it has installed the required IID on a vehicle owned or operated by the person. If, based upon notification from the interlock provider or otherwise, the department determines that an ignition interlock required is no longer installed or functioning as required, the DoL shall suspend the person's license or privilege to drive.

Whenever the license or driving privilege of any person is suspended or revoked as a result of noncompliance with an ignition interlock requirement, the suspension shall remain in effect until the person provides notice issued by a company doing business in the state that a vehicle owned or operated by the person is equipped with a functioning ignition interlock device.

Violations, Tampering, or Circumventing The IID

A violation of operating a motor vehicle without an IID when required to do so is a gross misdemeanor, and if charge with this crime face a maximum punishment upon conviction of a $5,000.00 fine, or 364 days in jail, or both.

Likewise, you are guilty of a gross misdemeanor if:

  • You are restricted to the use of a vehicle equipped with an IID and you tamper with the device or direct, authorize, or request another to tamper with the device, in order to circumvent the device by modifying, detaching, disconnecting, or otherwise disabling it
  • You knowingly assists another person who is restricted to the use of a vehicle equipped with an IID to circumvent the device or to start and operate that vehicle in violation of a court order.

HOWEVER, there is no crime if the starting of a motor vehicle or the request to start a motor vehicle, equipped with an ignition interlock device is done for the purpose of safety or mechanical repair of the device or the vehicle and the person subject to the court order does not operate the vehicle.

Call now for your free consultation (360) 306-8136

“Jonathan, thank you for bringing the best possible outcome today in my case. It was a humbling and very sobering experience and I am mindful everyday of my personal responsibility and actions and those around me. My career has taken off and I’m glad to have this chapter behind me and will move onward past probation!”
A DUI Client